Re: Problem with DISCARD and RAID10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 05:32:26PM +0800, Brad Campbell wrote:
> G'day Shaohua,
> 
> I'm testing Vanilla 3.7.0-rc4 and bumping up against squillions of these :
> 
> [   41.094726] request botched: dev sdc: type=1, flags=122d8081
> [   41.094774]   sector 28317178, nr/cnr 0/32
> [   41.094815]   bio ffff8807fe885300, biotail ffff8807fe887300,
> buffer           (null), len 0
> [   41.100045] request botched: dev sda: type=1, flags=122d8081
> [   41.100094]   sector 28317403, nr/cnr 0/32
> [   41.100134]   bio ffff8807fe885840, biotail ffff8807fe887840,
> buffer           (null), len 0
> [   41.100718] request botched: dev sdb: type=1, flags=122d8081
> [   41.100767]   sector 28317179, nr/cnr 0/224
> [   41.100808]   bio ffff8807fe885a80, biotail ffff8807fe887d80,
> buffer           (null), len 0
> [   41.104649] request botched: dev sdc: type=1, flags=122d8081
> [   41.104697]   sector 28317179, nr/cnr 0/224
> [   41.104738]   bio ffff8807fe886000, biotail ffff8807fe887300,
> buffer           (null), len 0

cc Martin to check if he has idea.

Hmm, I thought such problem is already fixed by Martin's discard merge patches
and my last test in SATA SSD doesn't show this problem. Maybe there is still
a corner case we didn't handle discard request merge well. Time run out today,
I'll check tomorrow.

Thanks,
Shaohua
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux