Re: Re: [PATCH 1/2] md:Avoid write invalid address if read_seqretry returned true.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 17:13:00 +0800 majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> If read_seqretry returned true and bbp was changed, it will write
>> invalid address which can cause some serious problem.
>> 
>> This bug was introduced by commit v3.0-rc7-130-g2699b67.
>> So fix is suitable for 3.0.y thru 3.6.y.
>> 
>> Reported-by: zhuwenfeng@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> Tested-by: zhuwenfeng@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/md/md.c |    4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
>> index 9ab768a..d63aa78 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
>> @@ -1805,15 +1805,15 @@ static void super_1_sync(struct mddev *mddev, struct md_rdev *rdev)
>>  		md_error(mddev, rdev);
>>  	else {
>>  		struct badblocks *bb = &rdev->badblocks;
>> -		u64 *bbp = (u64 *)page_address(rdev->bb_page);
>>  		u64 *p = bb->page;
>>  		sb->feature_map |= cpu_to_le32(MD_FEATURE_BAD_BLOCKS);
>>  		if (bb->changed) {
>>  			unsigned seq;
>> +			u64 *bbp;
>>  
>>  retry:
>> +			bbp = (u64 *)page_address(rdev->bb_page);
>>  			seq = read_seqbegin(&bb->lock);
>> -
>>  			memset(bbp, 0xff, PAGE_SIZE);
>>  
>>  			for (i = 0 ; i < bb->count ; i++) {
>
>
>No.
>The contents of the page might change, but it is always the same page, so it
>always has the same address, so "bbp" is guaranteed to be stable.
>
>NeilBrown
>
Is my understand wrong?
>u64 *bbp = (u64 *)page_address(rdev->bb_page);
>		u64 *p = bb->page;
>		sb->feature_map |= cpu_to_le32(MD_FEATURE_BAD_BLOCKS);
>		if (bb->changed) {
>			unsigned seq;

>retry:
>			seq = read_seqbegin(&bb->lock);

>			memset(bbp, 0xff, PAGE_SIZE);

>			for (i = 0 ; i < bb->count ; i++) {
>				u64 internal_bb = *p++;
>				u64 store_bb = ((BB_OFFSET(internal_bb) << 10)
>						| BB_LEN(internal_bb));
>				*bbp++ = cpu_to_le64(store_bb);
I think bbp will be changed. Is ok?
>			}
>			bb->changed = 0;
>			if (read_seqretry(&bb->lock, seq))
>				goto retry;

	?韬{.n?????%??檩??w?{.n???{炳盯w???塄}?财??j:+v??????2??璀??摺?囤??z夸z罐?+?????w棹f



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux