Re: Problem with DISCARD and RAID5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 05:38:54PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> 
> Hi Shaohua,
>  I've been doing some testing and discovered a problem with your discard
>  support for RAID5.
> 
>  The code in blkdev_issue_discard assumes that the 'granularity' is a power
>  of 2, and for example subtracts 1 to get a mask.
> 
>  However RAID5 sets the granularity to be the stripe size which often is not
>  a power of two.  When this happens you can easily get into an infinite loop.
> 
>  I suspect that to make this work properly, blkdev_issue_discard will need to
>  be changed to allow 'granularity' to be an arbitrary value.
>  When it is a power of two, the current masking can be used.
>  When it is anything else, it will need to use sector_div().

Yep, looks we need use sector_div. And this isn't the only problem. discard
request can be merged, and the merge check only checks max_discard_sectors.
That means the split requests in blkdev_issue_discard can be merged again. The
split nerver works.

I'm wondering what's purpose of discard_alignment and discard_granularity. Are
there devices with discard_granularity not 1 sector? If bio isn't discard
aligned, what device will do? Further, why driver handles alignment/granularity
if device will ignore misaligned request. Jens, can you share some hints please?

Thanks,
Shaohua
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux