Re: 3TB drives failure rate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/28/2012 08:12 PM, joystick wrote:
> On 10/28/12 23:10, Phil Turmel wrote:
>> The drives I've suffered with on this have ignored the link reset and
>> were still unresponsive when MD tried to rewrite the sector(s) involved
>> (from the other drives in the array).
> 
> Very interesting
> 
> I would like to see this behaviour to make some experiments.
> I would like to simulate an unreadable sector...
> I see --make-bad-sector in hdparm, does that simulate an unreadable
> sector faithfully?

I've never tried this, but the description of that option suggests that
it does.

> (e.g. will it even be recorded in SMART current_pending_sector /
> reallocated_sector_ct ?)

Pending, I would presume.  Which should go away when you write back over it.

> Also, how do I trigger a link reset manually?

That I don't know.  But you should get one when you try to read back
that bad sector, if the drive timeout is longer than the driver timeout.

Phil

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux