Re: [PATCH 1/5] md: When resync aborted,using ->curr_resync as the last completed request rather than ->curr_resync_completed.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 10:28:58 +0800 kernelmail <kedacomkernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> In commit(db91ff55bdf06736b849afc1b1fce5763bbb8d5d),it said:
> >If a resync is aborted we should record how far we got
> >(recovery_cp) the last request that we know has completed
> >(->curr_resync_completed) rather than the last request that was
> >submitted (->curr_resync).
> But when resync aborted, it execed
> >wait_event(mddev->recovery_wait, !atomic_read(&mddev->recovery_active));
> After this, the ->curr_resync is the last completed request.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/md/md.c |    3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> index 9ab768a..1d9940d 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> @@ -7558,8 +7558,7 @@ void md_do_sync(struct md_thread *thread)
>  					printk(KERN_INFO
>  					       "md: checkpointing %s of %s.\n",
>  					       desc, mdname(mddev));
> -					mddev->recovery_cp =
> -						mddev->curr_resync_completed;
> +					mddev->recovery_cp = mddev->curr_resync;
>  				}
>  			} else
>  				mddev->recovery_cp = MaxSector;

No.
This reverts commit db91ff55bdf06736b849afc1b1fce5763bbb8d5d

Maybe if we differentiated between an abort-due-to-error and an
abort-due-to-request, then in the second card we could use ->curr_resync.

NeilBrown

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux