On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:41:40 +0200 Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/17/2012 06:00 AM, Shaohua Li wrote: > > Thanks! Neil, this is the updated patch. If you prefer a fix against original > > patch, please let me know. > > I rather suspect that Neil has already applied the original version of > your patch, that Dan then ran his static checker on Neil's tree (or > perhaps on linux-next?) and found this problem. > > If so, Neil will need an incremental fix from you, rather than a fix > that's incorporated into the patch that introduced the problem. > > HTH, Jan If I had sent it upstream to Linus, then you would be right. But I haven't yet, it is just sitting in -next, and I regularly rebase my -next tree so I'll have no trouble replacing the offending one with the fixed up. Thanks, NeilBrown
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
