On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:08:55 +0200 Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 07/26/2012 04:58 AM, NeilBrown wrote: > > Hi Jens, > > the following series makes a number of changes to plugging, moving > > common code from md and umem into block, and modifying it to allow > > md to get more value out of it. > > They've been sitting in -next for a while. > > Are you OK with me forwarding them to Linus, or would you rather they > > went though your tree? > > Thanks Neil, looks good. I will apply them to my tree and do some basic > testing, too, then push it off for this round (where I haven't pushed > out yet). > Thanks Jens, However I've just today discovered that the very first patch causes a real regression in throughput for RAID5 and while I'm sure I can fix it with a subsequent patch (once I figure out exactly what it happening) it might make sense to hold them all back for 3.7. However if you would like to take them now and fix up later (it is only a performance regression so it won't really affect bisection) I can work with that. Thanks, NeilBrown
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
