Re: RAID5 superblock and filesystem recovery after re-creation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2012/7/9 NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>:
> On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 23:47:16 +0200 Alexander Schleifer
> <alexander.schleifer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> after a new installation of Ubuntu, my RAID5 device was set to
>> "inactive". All devices were set to spare device and the level was
>> unknown. So I tried to re-create the array by the following command.
>
> Sorry about that.  In case you haven't seen it,
>    http://neil.brown.name/blog/20120615073245
> explains the background
>
>>
>> mdadm --create /dev/md0 --assume-clean --level=5 --raid-disk=6
>> --chunk=512 --metadata=1.2 /dev/sde /dev/sdd /dev/sda /dev/sdc
>> /dev/sdg /dev/sdh
>>
>> I have a backup of the mdadm -Evvvvs output, so I could recover the
>> chunk size, metadata and offset (2048) from this information.
>>
>> The partially output of mdadm --create... shows this output:
>>
>> ...
>> mdadm: /dev/sde appears to be part of a raid array:
>>     level=raid5 devices=6 ctime=Sun Jul  8 23:02:51 2012
>> mdadm: partition table exists on /dev/sde but will be lost or
>>        meaningless after creating array
>> ...
>>
>> The array is recreated, but no valid filesystem is found on /dev/md0
>> (dumpe2fs: Filesystem revision too high while trying to open /dev/md0.
>> Couldn't find valid filesystem superblock.). Also fdisk /dev/sde shows
>> no partition.
>> My next step would be creating Linux RAID type partitions on the 6
>> devices with fdisk and call mdadm --create with /dev/sde1 /dev/sdd1
>> and so on.
>> Is this step a possible solution for recovering the filesystem?
>
> Depends.. Was the original array created on partitions, or on whole devices?
> The saved '-E' output should show that.
>
> Maybe you have the devices in the wrong order.  The order you have looks odd
> for a recently created array.
>
> NeilBrown

The original array was created on whole devices, as the saved output
starts with e.g. "/dev/sde:".
I used the order of the 'Device UUID' from the saved output to
recreate the order in the new system (the ports changed due to a new
mainboard). After the installation I had a degraded array in
initramfs, but I was able to simply "exit" the debug shell and the
array was accessible. I will now skip the step of creating raid type
partitions and try every possible order of devices.

Thanks,
-Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux