On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Add a per-stripe lock to protect stripe specific data, like dev->read,
> written, ... The purpose is to reduce lock contention of conf->device_lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/md/raid5.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> drivers/md/raid5.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux/drivers/md/raid5.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/drivers/md/raid5.c 2012-06-01 13:38:54.705210229 +0800
> +++ linux/drivers/md/raid5.c 2012-06-01 13:43:05.594056130 +0800
> @@ -749,6 +749,7 @@ static void ops_complete_biofill(void *s
>
> /* clear completed biofills */
> spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
> + spin_lock_irq(&sh->stripe_lock);
> for (i = sh->disks; i--; ) {
> struct r5dev *dev = &sh->dev[i];
>
> @@ -774,6 +775,7 @@ static void ops_complete_biofill(void *s
> }
> }
> }
> + spin_unlock_irq(&sh->stripe_lock);
> spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
Btw... I know this is fixed up in a later patch with the deletion of
device_lock, but bisection may land on this patch which enables irqs a
bit too early.
--
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
