Re: Software RAID checksum performance on 24 disks not even close to kernel reported

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7 June 2012 03:51, Ole Tange <ole@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
[…]
> So Igor: Do you have numbers that back up your claim? Or do you advice
> against it just because "it's simply stupid"?

   The reasons are pretty well described in FreeBSD 4.11 vinum's
manual (which I had been using long before LSR): «… For optimum
performance, stripes should be at least 128 kB in size: anything
smaller will result in a significant increase in I/O activity due to
mapping of individual requests over multiple disks. The performance
improvement due to the increased number of concurrent transfers caused
by this mapping will not make up for the performance drop due to the
increase in latency. A good guideline for stripe size is between 256
kB and 512 kB.  Avoid powers of 2, however: they tend to cause all
superblocks to be placed on the first subdisk. …» —
http://goo.gl/sTHxY

   P. S. Alas, LSR doesn't support anything but powers of 2 for chunk
sizes, but according to Neil Brown, it can be relatively easy changed.

--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux