On Thu, 17 May 2012 01:34:15 +0200 Oliver Martin <oliver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Neil, > > Am 11.05.2012 02:50, schrieb NeilBrown: > > Doing an in-place reshape with the new 3.3 code should work, though with a > > softer "should" than above. We will only know that it is "stable" when enough > > people (such as yourself) try it and report success. If anything does go > > wrong I would of course help you to put the array back together but I can > > never guarantee no data loss. You wouldn't be the first to test the code on > > live data, but you would be the second that I have heard of. > > I guess I'll be taking 2nd place then. I just used it on three live > raid6 arrays, and it worked perfectly. 3 arrays - so you are 2nd, 3rd, and 4th :-) Thanks. I often get failure reports and only more rarely get success reports, so I value them all the more. NeilBrown > > Thanks for your all your awesome work! > > Oliver > > PS: I wasn't subscribed to the list before, so I'm trying to reply to > this via gmane. No idea if this preserves all the list headers - if I > break the thread, that's probably the cause.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
