On 05/14/12 23:32, NeilBrown wrote: > On Mon, 14 May 2012 22:58:58 +0200 Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx> >> If you post a patch without including a proper commit message and >> signed-off-by lines, which is standard practice, then that is equivalent >> to you not having posted a patch in the first place. >> >> Don't blame others for not doing the basic work everybody else does when >> posting patches. It really isn't hard to comply with the standard patch >> posting rules! > > I decided a better approach is just to refresh from upstream: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/cilkplus/include/sha1.h > http://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/cilkplus/libiberty/sha1.c > > have been copied into mdadm with just a tiny change to not include config.h > > Seems to work, and probably has the *right* fix. I would tend to agree with you, if not we can hollor at the gcc guys :) Cheers, Jes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
