Re: Yet another corrupt raid5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 06 May 2012 11:21:15 +0200 Philipp Wendler <ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> So I did it, and it worked out fine on the first try.
> Luks could successfully decrypt it, fsck did not complain, mounting
> worked and data is also fine. So hurrayy and big thanks ;-)
> Now I am running the resync.

Good news!  thanks for letting us know.

> 
> >> Thank you very much in advance for your help.
> > 
> > Good luck, and please accept my apologies for the bug that resulted in this
> > unfortunate situation.
> 
> Hey, you don't need to apologize. I am a software developer as well, and
> I know that such things might happen. And it didn't crash my data, so
> everything is fine.
> 
> On the contrary, I want to thank all the developers here that you do all
> this work I can use for free (in both senses) and now when there was a
> problem, I could ask on this list and get such a extensive and helpful
> answer, although I am this "yet another guy" that asks something for the
> x-th time.

I find "Do unto other what you would have others do to you" to be a very good
idea.

And the more I can encourage people to test my development code and report
bugs, the more bugs I can fix before they get to paying customers - and that
is certainly a good thing :-)

Thanks,
NeilBrown

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux