Re: non fs-data and gpt partitioned md

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 19:02:21 -0600 Ken Gunderson <kgunders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


> > Any reason for preferring one of 1.0 and 1.2 is out side of md.
> > 
> > Maybe you want to be able to mount one half of a RAID1
> > independently.  You need 1.0 for that.  Maybe you want to ensure that
> > never happens.  Then 1.2 is better. Maybe your boot loaded only works
> > with one.  Then the choice is clear.
> 
> Well, this only pertains to /boot partition, so there's nothing to stop
> one from mixing and matching, e.g. Syslinux using 1.0 metadata for
> RAID1 /boot and 1.2 metadata for RAID10 swap and root devices, no? Or
> is this not advisable?

That is all fine.

NeilBrown

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux