Fix segfault caused by using rdev_for_each instead of rdev_for_each_safe
Commit dafb20fa34320a472deb7442f25a0c086e0feb33 mistakenly replaced a safe
iterator with an unsafe one when making some macro changes.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
Index: linux-upstream/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
===================================================================
--- linux-upstream.orig/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
+++ linux-upstream/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
@@ -861,7 +861,7 @@ static int analyse_superblocks(struct dm
int ret;
unsigned redundancy = 0;
struct raid_dev *dev;
- struct md_rdev *rdev, *freshest;
+ struct md_rdev *rdev, *tmp, *freshest;
struct mddev *mddev = &rs->md;
switch (rs->raid_type->level) {
@@ -879,7 +879,7 @@ static int analyse_superblocks(struct dm
}
freshest = NULL;
- rdev_for_each(rdev, mddev) {
+ rdev_for_each_safe(rdev, tmp, mddev) {
if (!rdev->meta_bdev)
continue;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
