On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:10:28 +0800 "kedacomkernel" <kedacomkernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Why not use md's description instead of mdadm' content? > I think this may be better,especially for people who's native language is not English. > Send me a patch which you think is an improvement. If I agree, I'll apply it. Thanks, NeilBrown > ------------------ > kedacomkernel > 2012-04-16 > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > 发件人：NeilBrown > 发送日期：2012-04-16 14:01:18 > 收件人：kedacomkernel > 抄送：linux-raid > 主题：Re: question about raid10 near copy info in man mdadm. > > On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 13:46:46 +0800 "kedacomkernel" <kedacomkernel@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > This is the man md about: > > When 'near' replicas are chosen, the multiple copies of a given chunk are laid out consecutively across > > the stripes of the array, so the two copies of a datablock will likely be at the same offset on two > > adjacent devices. > > "likely" is different from "certainly". In most cases they are the same > offset. In some cases they are different offsets. I think "likely" > describes that well enough. > > > > > I think the word "similar" is the same. > > "similar" is not the same as "same", though it is similar ..... > > "same" means there is no difference. > "similar" means there might be a difference, but it is not a big difference. > > Does that clear it up? > > NeilBrown > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
