On 12-03-13 10:47 PM, Shaohua Li wrote: > On 3/14/12 10:24 AM, NeilBrown wrote: >> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:04:12 +0800 Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: .. >> Also I wonder about handling failure in RAID1. >> I think the code will currently treat it like a write error, and >> maybe record a bad block (then fail the device is writing the badblock >> record fails). Is that what were want? > Mainly to simplify the code. And I thought a normal discard should not fail. > If it fails, something is wrong, marked it as badblock maybe not bad. That sounds like a VERY bad idea. Failures happen for lots of reasons, but generic comm errors are not an excuse to suddenly mark sectors as bad. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
