Re: RAID0 partition set to spare

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I don't know how the array could have got in this state.  IO errors on a
> RAID0 don't mark the devices as faulty.
> You would have to explicitly
>   mdadm /dev/md2 --fail /dev/sdb3
> or something like that - and I doubt you did that.
>
> Anyway:
>  mdadm -S /dev/md2
>  mdadm -C /dev/md2 -e 0.90 -c 64 -l 0 -n 2 /dev/sda3 /dev/sdb3
>
> should get you going again.  All the data should be there except for anything
> that the hard drive has decided to keep for itself.
>
> NeilBrown

This fixed it.  Thanks a bunch Neil and Jes!

-Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux