Re: [PATCH 1/1] Work around gcc-4.7's strict aliasing checks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/12/12 00:43, NeilBrown wrote:
> Applied - thanks...
> 
> Do you understand this stuff?  If this really "fixing" anything, or is it
> still doing something bad, but is now hiding it from gcc's warning so we just
> don't get told how naughty we are?
> 
> Should these things be changed to use unions ??

I have to admit that I didn't want to touch the functionality. It was
basically the sha code which is sensitive to changes, and I don't
understand the algorithm, and the ddf metadata which I have no way of
testing, so I opted for functionality rather than risking breaking
someone's data.

Cheers,
Jes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux