On 10/14/2011 11:45 AM, Johannes Moos wrote:
> Hi Phil,
> thanks for your help!
>
> On 13.10.2011 23:09, Phil Turmel wrote:
>> You *do* understand that "linear" has *no* redundancy? If you can't read anything at all off the bad drive, that fraction of your data is *gone*. As a linear array, files that are entirely allocated on the other three are likely to be recoverable.
> Yes, 500GB are gone for sure. It's just about recovering what's left on the three working drives.
>> Create a zeroed placeholder file for the missing drive (must be exactly the right size):
>>
>> dd if=/dev/zero of=Disk2_Partition3.fake bs=512 count=624353185
> OK, one 500GB drive is dead (I had 2x320GB and 2x500GB), so I modified the line to
> dd if=/dev/zero of=Disk2_Partition3.fake bs=512 count=$((499703758848/512))
> because Partition 3 on that drive was 499703758848 bytes
>> mdadm --create --metadata=0.90 --level=linear -n 4 /dev/md0 /dev/loop{0,1,2,3}
> I think I need --chunk=64 as well because mdadm defaults to 512kb and the Intel box uses 64kb?
> http://www.intel.com/support/motherboards/server/ss4000-e/sb/CS-029880.htm
Yes, indeed. I missed the "Rounding: 64K" in your mdadm -E report.
Phil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
