2011/10/12 Andrei Warkentin <andreiw@xxxxxxxxxx>: > If an incremental recovery was interrupted, a subsequent > re-add will result in a full recovery, even though an > incremental should be possible. > > This patch handles 99% of possible interruptions of an > incremental recovery (it doesn't handle I/O failure > that occurs immediately after the hot_add_disk(), which > causes the added rdev to become a spare). > > Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Andrei Warkentin <andrey.warkentin@xxxxxxxxx> > --- Here is an alternative idea, that doesn't involve messing with the superblocks - don't write out SB for recovering device (undergoing incremental) until array is not degraded. A -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
