W dniu 19.09.2011 05:12, NeilBrown pisze:
>
> Thanks.
> I've applied this... though I must admit that I don't really like all the
> GOTOs - but that is really the fault of udev I expect.
>
Yes, well - the alternative is a single bit longer line such as:
ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}!="ddf_raid_member", ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}!="isw_raid_member", ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}!="linux_raid_member", GOTO="md_inc_skip"
I thought the version with one more goto was more readable in the end,
though I also have my doubts about the choice.
> What was the rational for changing
> ==""
> to
> !="?*"
>
> ??
>
Actually none, just happened during the rewrite (both alternatives
are functionally identical) - I guess I'm more used to "?*" checks
for "is / isn't defined", so I didn't pay attention for it to be
exact like before.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
