Re: standard performance (write speed ??Mb/s) - new raid5 array

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I never used the whole disk in my raid, so maybe my procedure is not
useful in this case,
but i think if you create partitions, you should create the array using them,
using the following command mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md0
--level=raid5 --raid-devices=5 /dev/sd[bcdef]1 --metadata 1.2
i can't recall where i see why to specify this metadata level but in
my case the default was not 1.2 so i had to.

When the rebuild is done and a filesystem set , run this command dd
if=/dev/zero of=/some/dir/test.dd bs=4096 count=2621440
to actually test the performance of the raid.

2011/7/22 Pol Hallen <raid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> Why did you create partitions?  The whole point of zeroing the first 512
>> bytes was to *eliminate* all the partitions...
>
> Follow the post of Erwan Leroux, he advise creare a new partition with non-fs
> data :-/
>
>> No, you did not.  It seems you merged bits and pieces from each array
>> creation method.  The array may still function properly.  I've never
>> tried what you've done here.  Maybe others have the correct answer.
>
> I wish it's everything ok :-)
>
> Pol
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux