Re: misunderstanding of spare and raid devices? - and one question more

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Phil

If your CPU has free cycles, I suggest you run raid6 instead of raid5+spare.

Phil

I started the raid 6 array and get:

Personalities : [raid0] [raid1] [raid10] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
md0 : active raid6 sde5[4] sdd5[3] sdc5[2] sdb2[1] sda3[0]
      13759296 blocks level 6, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [5/5] [UUUUU]
      [=================>...]  resync = 87.4% (4013184/4586432) finish=0.4min speed=20180K/sec

when I started the raid 5 array I get

md0 : active raid5 sdd5[4] sde5[5](S) sdc5[2] sdb2[1] sda3[0]
      13759296 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/3] [UUU_]
      [=>...................]  recovery =  6.2% (286656/4586432) finish=0.9min speed=71664K/sec

so I have to expect a three times less write speed - or is this calculation
to simple ?

Karsten
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux