Re: Software RAID and TRIM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



nice,
anyone know if freebsd or netbsd or other o.s. have this (raid trim)
to do some benchmarks without losing our time developing?

2011/6/29 Tom De Mulder <tdm27@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, David Brown wrote:
>
>>> While you are mostly correct, over time even consumer SSDs will end up
>>> in this state.
>>
>> I don't quite follow you here - what state will consumer SSDs end up in?
>
> Sorry, I meant to say "SSDs in typical consumer desktop machines". The state
> where writes are very slow.
>
>> Have you tried any real-world benchmarking with realistic loads with a
>> single SSD, ext4, and TRIM on and off?  Almost every article I've seen on
>> the subject is using very synthetic benchmarks, almost always on windows,
>> few are done with current garbage-collecting SSDs.  It seems to be accepted
>> wisdom from the early days of SSDs that TRIM makes a big difference - and
>> few people challenge that with real numbers or real thought, even though the
>> internal structure of the flash has changed dramatically (transparent
>> compression, for example, gives a completely different effect).
>>
>> Of course, if you /do/ try it yourself and can show clear figures, then
>> I'm willing to change my mind :-)  If I had a spare SSD, I'd do the testing
>> myself.
>
> I have a set of 4 Intel 510 SSDs purely for testing, and I have used these
> to simulate the kinds of workload I would expect them to experience in a
> server environment (focused mainly on database access). So far, those tests
> have focused on using single drives (ie. without RAID) on a variety of
> controllers.
>
> Once the drives get fuller (something which does happen on servers) I do
> indeed see write latencies that are in the order of several seconds (I saw
> from 1500µs to 6000µs), as the drive suddenly struggles to free entire
> blocks, where initially latency was in the single digits.
>
> I am hoping to get my hands on some Sandforce controller-based SSDs as well,
> to compare, but even they show degradation as they get fuller in AnandTech's
> tests (and those tests seem, IME, trustworthy).
>
> My current plan is to sacrifice half the capacity by partitioning, stick 2
> of them in md RAID1 (so, without TRIM) and over the next few days to run
> benchmarks over them, to see what the end result is.
>
>
> Best,
>
> --
> Tom De Mulder <tdm27@xxxxxxxxx> - Cambridge University Computing Service
> +44 1223 3 31843 - New Museums Site, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QH
> -> 29/06/2011 : The Moon is Waning Crescent (18% of Full)



-- 
Roberto Spadim
Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux