Dne 28.6.2011 17:39, Phil Turmel napsal(a): >> >> It took me several years to find a reasonably fast way to >> offline-backup that partition with tens of millions of backuppc >> hardlinks :) > > I've heard of hardlink horrors with backuppc. I don't use it myself. > I prefer to use LVM on top of MD, then take compressed backups of LVM > snapshots. One of my goals was to be able to stick the offline backup drives to any PC, boot from a debian netinstall CD, chroot to the mirrored root, mount the large data partitions, and be ready to start recovery in a matter of minutes. Therefore I prefer the whole filesystems mirror. > > Mirror w/ bitmap would make 1:1 backups faster. I understand why you > are doing this, but I'd be worried about filesystem integrity at the > point in time you disconnect the backup drive. Have you performed > any tests to be sure you can recover usable data from the offline > copy? If I recall correctly, an LVM snapshot operation incorporates > a filesystem metadata sync. Yes, I am using a rather complicated automatic procedure. When the resyncing finishes, the script waits until backuppc finishes the currently running jobs (while starting new ones is disabled), shuts backuppc down, kills all other processes accessing the partition, umounts the filesystem, removes the offline drives from the md5/md6 arrays, mounts the backup raid again, restarts the backup processes, and then checks the offline copy: mounts the offline drives as partition and tries to read a random file from it. Only after that are the offline drives unmounted, their array disassembled and the drives put to sleep, until the operator removes them from their external bays and takes away from the company premises. The offline drives have saved my butt several times :) Regards, Pavel. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
