Re: Triple-parity raid6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/10/2011 10:45 AM, David Brown wrote:
Making multiple parity syndromes is easy enough mathematically:

Adam Leventhal, who wrote the double parity and triple parity code for ZFS, mentioned on his blog [1] that going beyond triple parity poses significant challenges if write performance should not suffer.

In particular, it looks like a relevant math paper (originally) had a flaw in the claim that quad parity and above can be implemented just like triple parity.

I don't know the implementation you were going to use, neither am I knowledgeable about multi-parity in general. I only thought it might be relevant to add to the current discussion that other people had issues with implementing N-parity for N > 3.


Christoph

[1] http://blogs.oracle.com/ahl/entry/triple_parity_raid_z
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux