Re: from 2x RAID1 to 1x RAID6 ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/06/2011 15:18, Nikolay Kichukov wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1



On 06/08/2011 01:33 PM, David Brown wrote:

So you install your RAID10 (or RAID6, if you prefer) system, and
make sure you keep backups.  And if you /do/ get hit by a double
disk failure in the wrong place, you spend the day restoring
everything from the backups.  When management complain that a 24
hour downtime doesn't fit with their 99.99% uptime expectations,
you remind them that this is amortized over the next 27 years...

Hi David,

nice one ;-) Did you actually calculate 24 hours for those 99.99%
within 27 years? ;-)


27.4 years is 10,000 days - so you can have 99.99% uptime with a 24-hour failure if you run for the rest of the 27.4 years without a hitch. Of course, by the same logic you can claim 6 nine's uptime with a week's failure - as long as there are no more problems for the next 20,000 years...

:-)


Cheers, - -Nik

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux