[PATCH 8 of 8 - v2] MD: raid5 do not set fullsync

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Neil, thanks for the insight on 'saved_raid_disk' - this is indeed better.

 brassow
==========

Add check to determine if a device needs full resync or if partial resync will do

RAID 5 was assuming that if a device was not In_sync, it must undergo a full
resync.  We add a check to see if 'saved_raid_disk' is the same as 'raid_disk'.
If it is, we can safely skip the full resync and rely on the bitmap for
partial recovery instead.  This is the legitimate purpose of 'saved_raid_disk',
from md.h:
int saved_raid_disk;            /* role that device used to have in the
                                 * array and could again if we did a partial
                                 * resync from the bitmap
                                 */

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/md/raid5.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -4858,7 +4858,7 @@ static raid5_conf_t *setup_conf(mddev_t 
 			printk(KERN_INFO "md/raid:%s: device %s operational as raid"
 			       " disk %d\n",
 			       mdname(mddev), bdevname(rdev->bdev, b), raid_disk);
-		} else
+		} else if (rdev->saved_raid_disk != raid_disk)
 			/* Cannot rely on bitmap to complete recovery */
 			conf->fullsync = 1;
 	}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux