On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 14 May 2011 12:27:45 +0400
> CoolCold <coolthecold@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> This is just one more live example for partitions vs disks setups.
>
> Well, they did use partitions, but what do you do when the new RAID controller
> bites off a whopping 100 million bytes from the end of your disk? I use
> partitions too, and do leave some space at the end for cases like this, but
> what I leave is just 8 MB (enough for the Gigabyte motherboards HPA), not
> 100+. Would you suggest setting aside 500MB, 1GB just in case?
I've always (well, after switching to partitions) used something near
80mb, for the last servers using ~ 160mb
root@kappa2:~# parted /dev/cciss/c0d1 print free
Model: Compaq Smart Array (cpqarray)
Disk /dev/cciss/c0d1: 1000GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
1 16.4kB 1000GB 1000GB primary
1000GB 1000GB 168MB Free Space
>
> --
> With respect,
> Roman
>
--
Best regards,
[COOLCOLD-RIPN]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
