Re: md question re: max_hw_sectors_kb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/04/2011 07:58 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
"Michael" == Michael Reed<mdr@xxxxxxx>  writes:

Michael>  There is code in blk_queue_make_request() which lowers the
Michael>  default value from INT_MAX to BLK_SAFE_MAX_SECTORS, which is
Michael>  255.  This is generally lower than all the underlying devices
Michael>  with which I use md.

Yeah, the SAFE value is there to appease legacy low-level drivers.


Michael>  As md appears to be a stacking driver, i.e., it calls
Michael>  disk_stack_limits() for each member of a volume, it would seem
Michael>  reasonable for md to use the, INT_MAX setting for
Michael>  max_hw_sectors_kb instead of BLK_SAFE_MAX_SECTORS.

Your fix is functionally correct. However, another case just popped up
this week where we need to distinguish between stacking driver and LLD
defaults. So I think we should try to handle this at the block layer
instead of explicitly tweaking this knob in MD.

I'll get this fixed up and will CC: you on the patch.


Could you please CC me or linux-raid as well? I have a similar patch for raid1 and while I'm not working on Lustre anymore, I know that Lustre also always has a another kernel patch for raid5...


Thanks,
Bernd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux