Re: Mirrored volume peformance questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



i think that a good add to today read balance could be add disk
acess_time (1/rpm, 0 for 'non rotational', 1 for unknow)
head_distance * acess_time, could allow a better select of disks or
mix of 7200/10000/15000 rpm disks
maybe it can be read from disk information at assemble time, i don't
know if disk speed (rpm) can be read from device block (some disks
display information with hdparm and smartctl)
it's not a 1000% improvement, it's 1% at high read/write load

2011/5/4 Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 09:42:40AM +0200, David Brown wrote:
>> raid10,far is better for sequential reads - it gives better-than-raid0
>> performance on average since it will do striped reads from the faster
>> outer tracks.  And for multi-threaded reads, it should also be a little
>> faster than other raid10 layouts (and raid1, which is much the same as
>> raid10,near).  Since it prefers to get the data from the outer half, you
>> get the benefits of short-stroking your disks - faster transfer speeds
>> and less head movement.
>>
>> The cost of raid10,far is greater head movement for writes - but that is
>> not the OP's main concern.
>
> yes, in theory this is so. But two reasons almost eliminates this in
> practice. First, the processes do not wait for completion of the IO of
> writes, the processes only deliver the data to the file buffer cache of
> the kernel, which then periodically flushes the data to the disk drives.
> Second, the flushing of the data is ordered so that the collected data
> buffers are written as much sequentially as possible to the drives.
> This goes for all Linux MD RAID1/RAID10 layouts. Given that random
> writes are random over the whole set of drives, for any mirrored
> raid1/raid10 layout, the flushing of the data is about the same.
>
> best regards
> keld
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>



-- 
Roberto Spadim
Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux