Re: mdadm raid1 read performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> I've been testing mdadm (great piece of software btw) however all my
>> test show that reading from raid1 is only the same speed as reading
>> from a single drive.
>
> Why do you expect RAID1 to be faster? ÂOn a single threaded sequential read
> there is not much it can do to go faster than a single device. ÂMaybe on some
> multi-thread random IOs it might.
> What sort of tests were you running?

It wouldn't surprise me if the OP had the same idea I had when I first
started reading about RAID many moons ago.

It seemed logical to me that if two disks had the same data and we
were reading an arbitrary amount of data, why couldn't we split the
read across both disks? That way we get the benefits of pulling from
multiple disks in the read case while accepting the penalty of a write
being as slow as the slowest disk..


-- 
Drew

"Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be understood."
--Marie Curie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux