Re: [Scst-devel] Tuning scst windows and sw raid5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Åukasz OleÅ <lukasz.oles@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Friday 22 of April 2011 16:19:48 you wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Åukasz OleÅ <lukasz.oles@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Also xfs is much better at dealing with large files than ntfs. ÂBest
>> apple to apples test is going to be on raw unformated partitions
> What this test(testing on raw partitions) can tell me? In the end I have to
> use filesystem.

it'll tell you that scst is being consistent.  there will always be
differences in filesystem performance, try ext3 on linux and you'll
see a huge difference from xfs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux