On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:37:23 -0500 Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I suggest that you avoid Silicon Image 3132, they have data corruption > > issue (on some board designs?), triggered or amplified by transferring via > > both ports at the same time, at full speed. > > Stating this opinion based on a very limited number of such reports is > irresponsible. Irresponsible to chip and board makers maybe, but I prefer to be responsible with regard to protecting my own data from possibly bad components first. > If the issue is a bad PCB from a couple of vendors, state the vendors and > the card model and rev. Yes, after the initial report I was thinking the problem is limited to one particular vendor of the boards or even just a batch, but since it was confirmed on this list, by person from a different continent, who bought card from a different place/vendor/batch and still had the exactly same issue, that's when it was enough for me to blacklist all cards on 3132 in general. > Case in point: > > http://blog.backblaze.com/2009/09/01/petabytes-on-a-budget-how-to-build-cheap-cloud-storage/ They also recommend using Seagate 7200.11 1.5TB drives, is that a recommendation you would also support? :) http://www.desktopreview.com/default.asp?newsID=593 http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/09/01/17/0115207/Seagate-Hard-Drive-Fiasco-Grows http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1098793&cid=26542735 > BackBlaze uses three Sil3132 based 2 port Syba PCIe x1 SATAII cards in > each storage 45 drive storage pod server, and one 4 port Addonics > Sil3124 PCI card. Odd balance WRT bandwidth, but if you read the doc > it'll be clear why they did this. The Syba card also costs 4 times what the cheaper cards on the same chip cost, so is that what it takes to make a non-data-corrupting card with SiI3132? At that price point, why not just get a Marvell 9123 anyway. Oh wait, there are reports that even Syba corrupts data in the same way! I even made a screenshot in case this goes away (can't find a permanent link other than http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16815124027) http://ompldr.org/vODl1eg/2011-04-15T045338Z-syba.png So it is just more expensive, not more reliable in any way. And it is after all the chip's fault. > Again, there is nothing wrong with the Silicon Image chips. They have a > very good reputation. I do not agree, they have an terrible reputation and an awful track record regarding reliability with the earlier 3112/3114/3124 chips. And their problems most often manifest in the worst way possible, as silent corruption of user data. See for yourself: https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=en&q=3112+data+corruption https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=en&q=3114+data+corruption "Sil3112/3114 are now virtually the only controllers with occassional and unresolved data corruption issues." http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/44799 "there are known major problems with Silicon Image controllers on FreeBSD, Linux, and Windows. The most common problem is silent data corruption. ...JMicron controllers are known to behave OK" http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2008-September/026152.html So it is not surprising to me AT ALL, that 3132 would also have similar kind of 'surprises'. And with presence of a readily-available cheap alternative, namely JMicron JMB363 (with an untarnished reputation, and being a nice standard 'ahci' controller), just excluding any Silicon Image from future choices forever, seems to be the right thing to do to me. -- With respect, Roman
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
