Re: RAID10 failure(s)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:49:03 -0600 Mark Keisler <grimm26@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Oh, duh, was thinking in 0+1 instead of 10.  I'm still wondering why
> you made mention of "but be really sure that the devices really are
> working before you try this."  If trying to bring the RAID back fails,
> I'm just back to not having access to the data which is where I am now
> :).

If you try reconstructing the array before you are sure you have resolved the
original problem (be it BIOS setting, bad cables, dodgey controller or even a
bad disk drive) then you risk compounding your problems and at least are
likely to waste time.
Sometimes people are in such a hurry to get access to their data that they
cut corners to their detriment.  I don't know if you are such a person, but
I mentioned it anyway just in case.

NeilBrown

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux