Re: write-behind has no measurable effect?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 22:38:17 +0100 Andras Korn <korn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I experimented a bit with write-mostly and write-behind and found that
> write-mostly provides a very significant benefit (see below) but
> write-behind seems to have no effect whatsoever.

The use-case where write-behind can be expected to have an effect is when the
throughput is low enough to be well within the capacity of all devices, but
the latency of the write-behind device is higher than desired.
write-behind will allow that high latency to be hidden (as long as the
throughput limit is not exceeded).

I suspect your tests did not test for low latency in a low-throughput
scenario.

NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux