Re: raid1 with rotating offsite disks for backup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/02/2011 19:53, Roberto Spadim wrote:
i agree with rsync
rsync is more filesystem related feature
if you want copy files, you should use rsync
if you want to copy the device, may be a dd with devices?
dd if=/dev/md0 of=/dev/sda

if you want a snapshot copy, you should first remount your filesystem
to readonly (there´s no flock() for /dev/md0 since filesystem don´t
use flock() on /dev/md0) or another way to block writes to filesystem
while you is read from device, some filesystems have online backup
features..
i don´t know lvm very well, but maybe they implement online backup there...
i don´t think it´s a problem to solve at md level (it could work, but
the raid1 purpose is make a fail safe device (or partially safe), not
a online backup device)

I do both with several of my customers: md array with LVM on top, suspend system services (mailstore), take snapshot, start system services, then rsync diff the snapshot to another drive with luks crypto, which gets rotated off-site once a week. Generally the backup drives are bigger than the system array, so I can keep at least a week's worth of nightlies and several months' worth of weeklies on each one.

Yes, I have my own separate securely-stored copies of their crypto keys.

Cheers,

John.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux