On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:18:18 +0100 Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Patches resolve problem with process crash at wait_barrier() > after raid0->raid10 takeover. > First patch resolve this particular problem. > Solution is similar to RAID1 barrier implementation. > Second is proposal for general protection against barrier > become negative. > > --- > > Krzysztof Wojcik (2): > FIX: md: process hangs at wait_barrier after 0->10 takeover Applied, thanks. > FIX: md: Prevent barrier become negative If we ever trying to make 'barrier' negative, that is a bug somewhere. So I would prefer: BUG_ON(conf->barrier <= 0); conf->barrier--; NeilBrown > > > drivers/md/raid1.c | 3 ++- > drivers/md/raid10.c | 9 ++++++--- > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
