Re: What's the typical RAID10 setup?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



FYI, you should get in the habit of using your mail client's reply to
all function.  I did not see this until now because you did not send me
a copy.

On 2/1/2011 4:20 AM, Robin Hill wrote:
> No, it's RAID 10 or RAID 1+0. RAID 0+1 would be 2 mirrored pairs of
> 5-disk RAID 0 arrays, in which case you could only lose 5 disks if

In English we read from left to right and top to bottom, so 0+1 means
stripe on top of mirror.

> The md man page would be better for information on the physical layouts,
> but I don't see anything on there to support what you're saying here.

The section on raid10 describes the layouts.  For a 4 disk array, the
default layout of n2 is equivalent to raid 0+1.  A 2, 3, or 5 disk array
is not even possible with 0+1, but raid10 is quite happy with that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux