Re: the true behavior of mdadm's raid-1 with regard to vertical parity and silent error detection/scrubbing- confirmation or feature request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 4 Sep 2010, Bill Davidsen wrote:

This has been discussed to death, I don't see any changes coming.

True. If someone really wants this (for instance 64k on drive using 4k ECC data for a total of 68k per stripe) and are willing to put either money on the table for someone to write it, or someone is volunteering, I don't see this coming either.

If someone is willing to actually code (or have it coded) then a discussion should first happen if such a change would be accepted.

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@xxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux