Hi Tejun, On 09/02/2010 10:22 PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > On 09/01/2010 09:15 AM, Kiyoshi Ueda wrote: >>> @@ -2619,9 +2458,8 @@ int dm_suspend(struct mapped_device *md, >>> up_write(&md->io_lock); >>> >>> /* >>> - * Request-based dm uses md->wq for barrier (dm_rq_barrier_work) which >>> - * can be kicked until md->queue is stopped. So stop md->queue before >>> - * flushing md->wq. >>> + * Stop md->queue before flushing md->wq in case request-based >>> + * dm defers requests to md->wq from md->queue. >>> */ >>> if (dm_request_based(md)) >>> stop_queue(md->queue); >> >> Request-based dm doesn't use md->wq now, so you can just remove >> the comment above. > > I sure can remove it but md->wq already has most stuff necessary to > process deferred requests and when someone starts using it, having the > comment there about the rather delicate ordering would definitely be > helpful, so I suggest keeping the comment. OK, makes sense. Thanks, Kiyoshi Ueda -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
