Tejun Heo, on 08/23/2010 04:14 PM wrote:
I think that's correct and changing the priority of DM_ENDIO_REQUEUE
for REQ_FLUSH down to the lowest should be fine.
(I didn't know that FLUSH failure implies data loss possibility.)
At least on ATA, FLUSH failure implies that data is already lost, so
the error can't be ignored or retried.
In SCSI there are conditions when a command, including FLUSH
(SYNC_CACHE), failed which don't imply lost data. For them the caller
expected to retry the failed command. Most common cases are Unit
Attentions and TASK QUEUE FULL status.
Vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
