Re: messed up changing chunk size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19/07/10 04:53, Roman Mamedov wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:32:25 -0700
Konstantin Svist<fry.kun@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:

I looked around and found that chunk size
of 512 should work better.

Not true, at least with RAID5/6 a chunk size of 64K performs faster, see
http://louwrentius.blogspot.com/2010/05/raid-level-and-chunk-size-benchmarks.html
http://alephnull.com/benchmarks/sata2009/chunksize.html

There is no mention in this benchmark tests if he modified the stripe cache. With an increased stripe size a larger stripe cache would be needed for good performance (at least from my experience)

Best Regards

Jools
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux