Re: Write-intent bitmap decreases or increase performance of RAID5?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010, Roman Mamedov wrote:

This is not necessary. See the dd man page about the conv=fdatasync switch.
You can even test with just 256 MB this way, and still get an extremely
accurate result.

You're right, for writing this is ok. For read tests it's important to use more than ram though, to avoid doing performance testing from block cache instead of from the actual drives.

See /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches.

--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
 "We can't solve today's problems by using the same thinking we
  used in creating them." - Einstein

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux