Re: raid5 failed while rebuiling - classical problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Janek Kozicki <janek_listy@xxxxx> writes:

> fsck finished, fixed a heft of bad inodes, and now everything seems to be
> fine. So now I'm going to upgrade all that, use latest kernel, then switch
> to raid6.
>
> I tested /dev/hda with badblocks read-write tests, and now it works fine,
> which is kind of disappointing, because it caused to me so much trouble.

If that wrote to the failed block it might cause the bad space to be
reallocated, which is by design what modern disks do.

> Its warranty is going to expire in 3 months, but since it works fine now I
> don't think that I could get it replaced. I guess that it will "really die"
> after its warranty will expire...

Depends entirely on your vendor; I have never had any refusal to replace a
disk after the first bad block, reallocated on write on not.  Those errors are
tracked and can be reported by the drive, incidentally, so it has not just
vanished away.

        Daniel

-- 
✣ Daniel Pittman            ✉ daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx            ☎ +61 401 155 707
               ♽ made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux