Re: Data-check brings system to a standstill

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/16/2010 11:52 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Alternatively, you can try setting your io scheduler to 
> deadline,

Wow - huge difference! No "hung task" warnings, no processes stuck in
"D" state; the system remains completely responsive throughout the
entire check.

I don't see why, though, processes are blocking for 2+ minutes on the
simplest of I/O operations when the default CFQ scheduler is used. Isn't
CFQ supposed to distribute I/O bandwidth in a "completely fair" manner?
Do md checks bypass the fairness algorithm?

-- 
Jordan Russell
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux