On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:46:05 -0400 aragonx@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > While I would agree with you if the performance was the same for reads as > it was writes, that is not the case here. Reads are a massively faster operation on RAID5 than writes, in my experience an array easily reads at close to the theoretical limit, i.e. the speed of its slowest member multiplied by the member count minus one. -- With respect, Roman
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
