Re: RAID10 n1 layout?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 03:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
Adrian Sandor <aditsu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi, I've just created a RAID10 with mdadm using default options, and with -v it said:
>     mdadm: layout defaults to n1
> According to the docs, the default should be n2, and n1 would mean no redundancy (like RAID0)
> Furthermore, after creating the array, I checked it with -D and it said:
>     Layout : near=2
> Is this a bug?
> I'm using mdadm 3.0

Yes it is a bug.  It says "n1" but it means "n2".

It will be fixed in the next release.

Thanks for the report.

NeilBrown

> 
> Thanks
> Adrian
> 
> 
>       
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux