Re: migrating from RAID5 to RAID10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gilad Arnold wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:30:31AM -0700, Gilad Arnold wrote:
Thanks for the thorough evaluation and thoughtful advice! Much
appreciated.  I agree it makes a lot more sense and I will follow your
suggested procedure (when I get to purchase the extra drive ;-) )

PS, a related question: some measurements posted on the web suggest that
RAID10 in f2 mode is far superior to n2 (the default?) when it comes to
reading performance, and only mildly inferior when writing.  I tend to
go with f2, unless someone tells me it's a bad idea.

It is a GREAT idea, and will produce much better sustained read performance.

--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
 "We can't solve today's problems by using the same thinking we
  used in creating them." - Einstein

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux